Marketing Proposal Judge
Upload a proposal and rubric for review
Description
Evaluates marketing, brand, and startup proposals from the perspective of an experienced judge, providing actionable improvement advice. Based on review criteria distilled from outstanding past submissions—including brand proposals, marketing plans, and business plans—it diagnoses work across seven dimensions: structural completeness; evidence and data quality; positioning and marketing strategy; business model and finance; proven results; social value; and presentation. It outputs a category-by-category scorecard, a summary of strengths, a prioritized improvement checklist, and predicted defense questions. Supports a re-review mode that compares scores from the previous round, verifies completion of each improvement item, and shows before-and-after results. It also identifies the work's status—working draft, validation draft, or submission draft—to calibrate scoring; checks the authenticity of cultural narratives, cost constraints for creative activities, and standards for figure, table, and contents lists. Suitable for pre-competition refinement, peer review, classroom critique, and pre-submission checks. It does not fabricate official scores or invent missing data. Competition proposal judge: evaluates marketing, brand, and startup proposals from an experienced judge's perspective and provides actionable advice across structure, evidence and data quality, positioning and marketing, business model and finance, proven results, social value, and presentation. Supports re-review mode with before-and-after comparisons. Trigger terms: proposal scoring, judge's perspective, work critique, improvement advice, pre-competition refinement, proposal diagnosis, peer review, classroom critique, national competition standards, re-review, before-and-after comparison
Related Skills
View all
Marketing Plan Architect
A marketing competition proposal coach for students and instructors. Grounded in real-world business problems, it guides you through understanding the competition brief, research, data analysis and chart creation, brand positioning and visual design, marketing strategy, event execution, budget estimates, proposal writing, and defense preparation. It supports co-creation from scratch, chapter-by-chapter guidance, diagnosis of existing drafts, pre-submission review, defense practice, and post-review revision. Together with the judge Skill (Marketing-Proposal-Judge), it creates a “write → review → revise → re-review” loop: the post-review revision mode turns the judge’s improvement checklist into actionable revisions—including chart templates, cultural material research and usage boundaries, creative event design, a VI brief, and expanded defense content—along with a student research toolkit. Data analysis produces standardized tables and renderable charts, including Mermaid pie charts, flowcharts, Gantt charts, and xyChart. Brand design provides methods for developing positioning statements, brand personality, and a VI visual brief. It does not mechanically stack models, fabricate research, or promise awards. Get started by providing a brand or product, competition rules, and existing materials; when data is unavailable, it begins by designing the research. This marketing competition proposal coach supports research, data analysis and charting, brand positioning and visual design, strategy, execution, budgeting, writing, defense preparation, and post-review revision in a write-review-revise-re-review loop.
Competitive Intel Analyst
Start with a broad view to build a persuasive competitor database, then focus the output on the company’s core business and decision-making needs. This elevates competitor research from “case hunting” to a decision basis that can be verified, compared, and acted on. This is not a prompt that merely lists a few competitors and stitches together webpage screenshots, nor one that crams every database detail into a PPT. “Competitive Intel Analyst” is suitable for consumer goods, technology products, software services, healthcare, education, retail, manufacturing, and other industries. It first defines the research scope and builds a multidimensional search framework covering markets, companies, products/services, user value, technology paths, business models, pricing and channels, intellectual property, partners, and evidence sources. It then creates a continuously updateable, deduplicated, traceable competitor database. Finally, based on the company’s core business, intended use cases, and leadership’s decision questions, it selects a small number of highly relevant benchmarks and produces a conclusion-first leadership briefing PPT, opportunity gaps, and an action roadmap. Suitable for: Panoramic scans of new markets or product categories Product planning, technology planning, and annual strategy research Tracking key competitors, patents, suppliers, or partner ecosystems Adding to, cleaning, and updating evidence in existing competitor databases or PPTs Investment, business development, and management decision briefings Condensing large volumes of material into conclusions that leaders can understand and teams can act on Typical deliverables include a complete competitor database, a shortlist of core competitors, a leadership briefing PPT, technology/patent/ecosystem maps (as needed), an opportunity and risk list, 90/180/365-day action roadmaps, and a source index.
Voc. Thesis Rev.: E-com & Live
A thesis review skill designed specifically for vocational college majors in network marketing and live streaming e-commerce. From the perspective of an associate professor tutor, it conducts an in-depth review in 5 steps: Form Compliance → Topic Selection & Abstract → Main Structure → Argumentation & Data → Academic Standards & Overall Evaluation. At each step, it produces a structured scoring sub-table and a list of tutor comments, finally culminating in a complete scoring summary table and a warm tutor letter-style feedback. It incorporates the 2026 Ministry of Education new national standard (GB/T 7713.1—2026), plagiarism check ≤30%, AIGC ≤25% compliance benchmarks, and accurately identifies errors in professional practice points such as live streaming product selection, scripts, ad delivery, GMV, and private domain. Suitable for staged review of first draft, second draft, and final draft.
Marketing Proposal Judge
Upload a proposal and rubric for review
Description
Evaluates marketing, brand, and startup proposals from the perspective of an experienced judge, providing actionable improvement advice. Based on review criteria distilled from outstanding past submissions—including brand proposals, marketing plans, and business plans—it diagnoses work across seven dimensions: structural completeness; evidence and data quality; positioning and marketing strategy; business model and finance; proven results; social value; and presentation. It outputs a category-by-category scorecard, a summary of strengths, a prioritized improvement checklist, and predicted defense questions. Supports a re-review mode that compares scores from the previous round, verifies completion of each improvement item, and shows before-and-after results. It also identifies the work's status—working draft, validation draft, or submission draft—to calibrate scoring; checks the authenticity of cultural narratives, cost constraints for creative activities, and standards for figure, table, and contents lists. Suitable for pre-competition refinement, peer review, classroom critique, and pre-submission checks. It does not fabricate official scores or invent missing data. Competition proposal judge: evaluates marketing, brand, and startup proposals from an experienced judge's perspective and provides actionable advice across structure, evidence and data quality, positioning and marketing, business model and finance, proven results, social value, and presentation. Supports re-review mode with before-and-after comparisons. Trigger terms: proposal scoring, judge's perspective, work critique, improvement advice, pre-competition refinement, proposal diagnosis, peer review, classroom critique, national competition standards, re-review, before-and-after comparison
Related Skills
View allMarketing Plan Architect
A marketing competition proposal coach for students and instructors. Grounded in real-world business problems, it guides you through understanding the competition brief, research, data analysis and chart creation, brand positioning and visual design, marketing strategy, event execution, budget estimates, proposal writing, and defense preparation. It supports co-creation from scratch, chapter-by-chapter guidance, diagnosis of existing drafts, pre-submission review, defense practice, and post-review revision. Together with the judge Skill (Marketing-Proposal-Judge), it creates a “write → review → revise → re-review” loop: the post-review revision mode turns the judge’s improvement checklist into actionable revisions—including chart templates, cultural material research and usage boundaries, creative event design, a VI brief, and expanded defense content—along with a student research toolkit. Data analysis produces standardized tables and renderable charts, including Mermaid pie charts, flowcharts, Gantt charts, and xyChart. Brand design provides methods for developing positioning statements, brand personality, and a VI visual brief. It does not mechanically stack models, fabricate research, or promise awards. Get started by providing a brand or product, competition rules, and existing materials; when data is unavailable, it begins by designing the research. This marketing competition proposal coach supports research, data analysis and charting, brand positioning and visual design, strategy, execution, budgeting, writing, defense preparation, and post-review revision in a write-review-revise-re-review loop.
Competitive Intel Analyst
Start with a broad view to build a persuasive competitor database, then focus the output on the company’s core business and decision-making needs. This elevates competitor research from “case hunting” to a decision basis that can be verified, compared, and acted on. This is not a prompt that merely lists a few competitors and stitches together webpage screenshots, nor one that crams every database detail into a PPT. “Competitive Intel Analyst” is suitable for consumer goods, technology products, software services, healthcare, education, retail, manufacturing, and other industries. It first defines the research scope and builds a multidimensional search framework covering markets, companies, products/services, user value, technology paths, business models, pricing and channels, intellectual property, partners, and evidence sources. It then creates a continuously updateable, deduplicated, traceable competitor database. Finally, based on the company’s core business, intended use cases, and leadership’s decision questions, it selects a small number of highly relevant benchmarks and produces a conclusion-first leadership briefing PPT, opportunity gaps, and an action roadmap. Suitable for: Panoramic scans of new markets or product categories Product planning, technology planning, and annual strategy research Tracking key competitors, patents, suppliers, or partner ecosystems Adding to, cleaning, and updating evidence in existing competitor databases or PPTs Investment, business development, and management decision briefings Condensing large volumes of material into conclusions that leaders can understand and teams can act on Typical deliverables include a complete competitor database, a shortlist of core competitors, a leadership briefing PPT, technology/patent/ecosystem maps (as needed), an opportunity and risk list, 90/180/365-day action roadmaps, and a source index.
Voc. Thesis Rev.: E-com & Live
A thesis review skill designed specifically for vocational college majors in network marketing and live streaming e-commerce. From the perspective of an associate professor tutor, it conducts an in-depth review in 5 steps: Form Compliance → Topic Selection & Abstract → Main Structure → Argumentation & Data → Academic Standards & Overall Evaluation. At each step, it produces a structured scoring sub-table and a list of tutor comments, finally culminating in a complete scoring summary table and a warm tutor letter-style feedback. It incorporates the 2026 Ministry of Education new national standard (GB/T 7713.1—2026), plagiarism check ≤30%, AIGC ≤25% compliance benchmarks, and accurately identifies errors in professional practice points such as live streaming product selection, scripts, ad delivery, GMV, and private domain. Suitable for staged review of first draft, second draft, and final draft.
Find your next favorite skill
Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.