Voc. Thesis Rev.: E-com & Live
Description
A thesis review skill designed specifically for vocational college majors in network marketing and live streaming e-commerce. From the perspective of an associate professor tutor, it conducts an in-depth review in 5 steps: Form Compliance → Topic Selection & Abstract → Main Structure → Argumentation & Data → Academic Standards & Overall Evaluation. At each step, it produces a structured scoring sub-table and a list of tutor comments, finally culminating in a complete scoring summary table and a warm tutor letter-style feedback. It incorporates the 2026 Ministry of Education new national standard (GB/T 7713.1—2026), plagiarism check ≤30%, AIGC ≤25% compliance benchmarks, and accurately identifies errors in professional practice points such as live streaming product selection, scripts, ad delivery, GMV, and private domain. Suitable for staged review of first draft, second draft, and final draft.
Related Skills
View all
E-Commerce Thesis Check Guide
Stuck on your e-commerce undergraduate thesis? Does your current status section read like a company intro? Is your strategy section just the classic "strengthen promotion, improve service" four-piece set? Did you only realize two weeks before your defense that your title doesn't match your content? This skill is a revision workbench designed for e-commerce undergraduates. Its 13 commands help you check: whether the title is correct, whether the framework holds up, whether the paragraph arguments have loopholes, whether sentences are smooth, whether the same indicator has inconsistent definitions across chapters, why the defense teacher asks a certain question, and where follow-up questions might come from. In a word: AI won't write your thesis for you, but it helps you see where the problems are, how to fix them, and what to do next. What it cares about most: It will not fabricate data for you, will not write company facts for you, and will not write entire paragraphs of text for you. All revision suggestions leave a placeholder like 【Please replace with your real data】 so that you fill in with the authentic materials you collected yourself—so the thesis you submit is yours, not AI's. When checking sentence by sentence, each sentence's issues are categorized into two types: 【Structural issues】 that need content addition or rewriting, and 【Language issues】 that are suitable for polishing—so you won't use smooth wording to mask empty content, and you can clearly see which sentences are truly revised after editing. Coverage: mainstream e-commerce directions such as online marketing, store operations, short videos, live streaming sales, cross-border, private domains, agricultural product e-commerce, and more. From first draft self-check, chapter-by-chapter proofreading, version comparison to defense preparation, multiple rounds of follow-up. 【For advisors】 Teachers supervising e-commerce undergraduate theses can also use it this way: have students first run /check to diagnose the four layers of issues—framework, evidence, paragraphs, sentences—and then come for a meeting with the diagnostic report. This way, your grading time can focus more on judgment and direction rather than reading through everything to find problems. The /compare command can also directly compare the student's first draft and second draft to see if the revisions are adequate. Not suitable for: master's/doctoral theses, journal submissions, or non-e-commerce undergraduate theses. v2.2.1 early version. Feedback from students and advisors is welcome to help us make this revision workbench even smoother.
Nursing Thesis Pre-review Expert
Preparing to submit your undergraduate nursing thesis? Let this rigorous pre-review expert assist you. Designed specifically for nursing undergraduates and their advisors, this skill conducts a dual review of 'form and content' for cross-sectional survey papers, ensuring your thesis meets high standards before submission to your advisor. This expert strictly follows the EQUATOR International Reporting Guidelines (STROBE Statement) and school-based thesis writing standards, thoroughly reviewing your thesis from abstract, introduction, methods, results, to discussion and conclusion. It meticulously checks details such as P-value formatting, font specifications, citation superscripts, and corrects colloquial expressions to ensure professional and academically rigorous language. Additionally, it evaluates the practicality, innovation, and scientific validity of the introduction, and examines key methodological aspects such as inclusion/exclusion criteria, sample size calculation, data collection methods, and ethical review. For statistical analysis, whether multiple linear regression or logistic regression, the expert automatically determines the method and checks dummy variable settings, indicator completeness, etc., and prompts to avoid repeating results or including specific numbers in the conclusion. Finally, you will receive a detailed pre-review report clearly identifying issues needing correction and providing professional revision principles to help you craft a flawless nursing thesis.
Marketing Proposal Judge
Evaluates marketing, brand, and startup proposals from the perspective of an experienced judge, providing actionable improvement advice. Based on review criteria distilled from outstanding past submissions—including brand proposals, marketing plans, and business plans—it diagnoses work across seven dimensions: structural completeness; evidence and data quality; positioning and marketing strategy; business model and finance; proven results; social value; and presentation. It outputs a category-by-category scorecard, a summary of strengths, a prioritized improvement checklist, and predicted defense questions. Supports a re-review mode that compares scores from the previous round, verifies completion of each improvement item, and shows before-and-after results. It also identifies the work's status—working draft, validation draft, or submission draft—to calibrate scoring; checks the authenticity of cultural narratives, cost constraints for creative activities, and standards for figure, table, and contents lists. Suitable for pre-competition refinement, peer review, classroom critique, and pre-submission checks. It does not fabricate official scores or invent missing data. Competition proposal judge: evaluates marketing, brand, and startup proposals from an experienced judge's perspective and provides actionable advice across structure, evidence and data quality, positioning and marketing, business model and finance, proven results, social value, and presentation. Supports re-review mode with before-and-after comparisons. Trigger terms: proposal scoring, judge's perspective, work critique, improvement advice, pre-competition refinement, proposal diagnosis, peer review, classroom critique, national competition standards, re-review, before-and-after comparison
Voc. Thesis Rev.: E-com & Live
Description
A thesis review skill designed specifically for vocational college majors in network marketing and live streaming e-commerce. From the perspective of an associate professor tutor, it conducts an in-depth review in 5 steps: Form Compliance → Topic Selection & Abstract → Main Structure → Argumentation & Data → Academic Standards & Overall Evaluation. At each step, it produces a structured scoring sub-table and a list of tutor comments, finally culminating in a complete scoring summary table and a warm tutor letter-style feedback. It incorporates the 2026 Ministry of Education new national standard (GB/T 7713.1—2026), plagiarism check ≤30%, AIGC ≤25% compliance benchmarks, and accurately identifies errors in professional practice points such as live streaming product selection, scripts, ad delivery, GMV, and private domain. Suitable for staged review of first draft, second draft, and final draft.
Related Skills
View allE-Commerce Thesis Check Guide
Stuck on your e-commerce undergraduate thesis? Does your current status section read like a company intro? Is your strategy section just the classic "strengthen promotion, improve service" four-piece set? Did you only realize two weeks before your defense that your title doesn't match your content? This skill is a revision workbench designed for e-commerce undergraduates. Its 13 commands help you check: whether the title is correct, whether the framework holds up, whether the paragraph arguments have loopholes, whether sentences are smooth, whether the same indicator has inconsistent definitions across chapters, why the defense teacher asks a certain question, and where follow-up questions might come from. In a word: AI won't write your thesis for you, but it helps you see where the problems are, how to fix them, and what to do next. What it cares about most: It will not fabricate data for you, will not write company facts for you, and will not write entire paragraphs of text for you. All revision suggestions leave a placeholder like 【Please replace with your real data】 so that you fill in with the authentic materials you collected yourself—so the thesis you submit is yours, not AI's. When checking sentence by sentence, each sentence's issues are categorized into two types: 【Structural issues】 that need content addition or rewriting, and 【Language issues】 that are suitable for polishing—so you won't use smooth wording to mask empty content, and you can clearly see which sentences are truly revised after editing. Coverage: mainstream e-commerce directions such as online marketing, store operations, short videos, live streaming sales, cross-border, private domains, agricultural product e-commerce, and more. From first draft self-check, chapter-by-chapter proofreading, version comparison to defense preparation, multiple rounds of follow-up. 【For advisors】 Teachers supervising e-commerce undergraduate theses can also use it this way: have students first run /check to diagnose the four layers of issues—framework, evidence, paragraphs, sentences—and then come for a meeting with the diagnostic report. This way, your grading time can focus more on judgment and direction rather than reading through everything to find problems. The /compare command can also directly compare the student's first draft and second draft to see if the revisions are adequate. Not suitable for: master's/doctoral theses, journal submissions, or non-e-commerce undergraduate theses. v2.2.1 early version. Feedback from students and advisors is welcome to help us make this revision workbench even smoother.
Nursing Thesis Pre-review Expert
Preparing to submit your undergraduate nursing thesis? Let this rigorous pre-review expert assist you. Designed specifically for nursing undergraduates and their advisors, this skill conducts a dual review of 'form and content' for cross-sectional survey papers, ensuring your thesis meets high standards before submission to your advisor. This expert strictly follows the EQUATOR International Reporting Guidelines (STROBE Statement) and school-based thesis writing standards, thoroughly reviewing your thesis from abstract, introduction, methods, results, to discussion and conclusion. It meticulously checks details such as P-value formatting, font specifications, citation superscripts, and corrects colloquial expressions to ensure professional and academically rigorous language. Additionally, it evaluates the practicality, innovation, and scientific validity of the introduction, and examines key methodological aspects such as inclusion/exclusion criteria, sample size calculation, data collection methods, and ethical review. For statistical analysis, whether multiple linear regression or logistic regression, the expert automatically determines the method and checks dummy variable settings, indicator completeness, etc., and prompts to avoid repeating results or including specific numbers in the conclusion. Finally, you will receive a detailed pre-review report clearly identifying issues needing correction and providing professional revision principles to help you craft a flawless nursing thesis.
Marketing Proposal Judge
Evaluates marketing, brand, and startup proposals from the perspective of an experienced judge, providing actionable improvement advice. Based on review criteria distilled from outstanding past submissions—including brand proposals, marketing plans, and business plans—it diagnoses work across seven dimensions: structural completeness; evidence and data quality; positioning and marketing strategy; business model and finance; proven results; social value; and presentation. It outputs a category-by-category scorecard, a summary of strengths, a prioritized improvement checklist, and predicted defense questions. Supports a re-review mode that compares scores from the previous round, verifies completion of each improvement item, and shows before-and-after results. It also identifies the work's status—working draft, validation draft, or submission draft—to calibrate scoring; checks the authenticity of cultural narratives, cost constraints for creative activities, and standards for figure, table, and contents lists. Suitable for pre-competition refinement, peer review, classroom critique, and pre-submission checks. It does not fabricate official scores or invent missing data. Competition proposal judge: evaluates marketing, brand, and startup proposals from an experienced judge's perspective and provides actionable advice across structure, evidence and data quality, positioning and marketing, business model and finance, proven results, social value, and presentation. Supports re-review mode with before-and-after comparisons. Trigger terms: proposal scoring, judge's perspective, work critique, improvement advice, pre-competition refinement, proposal diagnosis, peer review, classroom critique, national competition standards, re-review, before-and-after comparison
Find your next favorite skill
Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.