Audience Comment Reply Builder
Create thoughtful replies and engagement prompts
Description
Enter a user comment to generate replies in different styles: friendly and humorous, professional and precise, or warm and empathetic; generate comment-section prompts that encourage likes, reads, shares, and comments; generate automated direct-message reply templates, including welcome messages, keyword replies, event announcements, and answers to frequently asked questions.
Related Skills
View all
Art Therapy Salon Recap Writer
Helps art therapy facilitators instantly capture touching moments after a session through warm conversational questions, generating a WeChat public account recap article that retains their personal speaking style and genuine emotions.
Viral Comment Engine
Paste top comments → auto-generate viral content for Douyin, WeChat, and Xiaohongshu There are thousands of comments in your comment section, each one is a topic not yet written — You just need someone to dig them out, write them across three platforms, and remove the AI flavor. This engine replaces the workload of content planners + writers + editors. A part-time writer costs two to three thousand a month, but this engine is permanent. Two-step pipeline: ① Paste top comments → automatically analyze hidden emotions and real pain points → Extract a strong point that can serve as a headline ② One-click platform selection → Douyin live script (with timestamps and emotion annotations), WeChat in-depth article, Xiaohongshu image-text notes —— Three completely different writing logics, not copy-paste with a few word changes Essential difference from free AI: forced removal of AI flavor. What you get is not nonsense starting with 'In today's society' or 'To sum up', but real content ready to shoot and publish. Full guidance throughout, output with human touch.
SCI Rebuttal Generator
At the final stage of SCI paper publication, properly handling peer review comments is crucial. When facing a Major Revision or harsh review comments, authors often spend significant effort deciphering the reviewer's intent and crafting a response in rigorous, appropriate academic English. A single misstep in tone, logic, or format in the rebuttal letter can trigger negative emotions from reviewers, leading to eventual rejection and severely delaying research dissemination. This skill is specifically designed for graduate students, university faculty, and researchers, built on established best practices from top international journals and academic publishing standards. Simply input the reviewer's original comment and briefly describe your actual response in Chinese (no matter how straightforward), and the engine will automatically restructure the logic to generate: ✅ Academic Tone Restructuring: Convert plain Chinese ideas into objective, humble, and professional top-tier academic English, avoiding misunderstandings due to language habits. ✅ Standardized Point-by-Point Response: Strictly follow the point-by-point response paradigm favored by top international journals, with clear structure for rapid verification by editors and reviewers. ✅ Multi-Scenario Strategy Matching: Includes 5 professional response strategies (accept suggestion and revise, agree but need extensive revision, acknowledge limitations, define research scope, politely refute), providing airtight defensive phrasing. ✅ Taboo Expression Filter: Automatically identify and correct implied offensive expressions in rebuttals (like 'obviously', 'the reviewer is wrong'), ensuring tone remains appropriate. [Use Case Demo] 📝 Your Input: Reviewer's Comment: The experimental method is somewhat outdated. Why not use the latest Method X? Your Chinese Idea: Method X is indeed new, but it doesn't suit the specific materials of this study, and current experimental conditions cannot realize it. I have already added an explanation in the discussion section for why the current method was chosen. ✨ AI-Generated Top-Tier Response: Reviewer's Comment: The experimental method is somewhat outdated. Why not use the latest Method X? Author's Response: We are grateful for this insightful suggestion. While we recognize the value of Method X as a highly advanced approach, it falls outside the primary focus of the current study because our material system requires specific characterization conditions that Method X does not currently support. We have explicitly discussed this methodological choice and its rationale in the revised manuscript (Discussion Section, Page 8, Lines 234-241) to clarify this point. Action Taken: Added a new paragraph in the Discussion section (Page 8) explaining the rationale for the chosen method. [Academic Integrity Commitment] This skill strictly adheres to academic ethics: it does not fabricate references, invent experimental data, or make academic judgments for you. All response strategies are reconstructed based on the real information you provide; AI is only responsible for language restructuring and logical optimization. When your input is insufficient to generate a complete response, AI will clearly indicate what needs to be supplemented, never making up scientific reasons on its own. [Scope of Application] SCI / SSCI / EI journal revision submissions, conference paper rebuttals, peer review communications. Eliminate cross-language communication barriers, reduce energy loss during revision. Hand over the tedious response work to AI, allowing you to focus on research itself. Help your academic work achieve acceptance!
Audience Comment Reply Builder
Create thoughtful replies and engagement prompts
Description
Enter a user comment to generate replies in different styles: friendly and humorous, professional and precise, or warm and empathetic; generate comment-section prompts that encourage likes, reads, shares, and comments; generate automated direct-message reply templates, including welcome messages, keyword replies, event announcements, and answers to frequently asked questions.
Related Skills
View allArt Therapy Salon Recap Writer
Helps art therapy facilitators instantly capture touching moments after a session through warm conversational questions, generating a WeChat public account recap article that retains their personal speaking style and genuine emotions.
Viral Comment Engine
Paste top comments → auto-generate viral content for Douyin, WeChat, and Xiaohongshu There are thousands of comments in your comment section, each one is a topic not yet written — You just need someone to dig them out, write them across three platforms, and remove the AI flavor. This engine replaces the workload of content planners + writers + editors. A part-time writer costs two to three thousand a month, but this engine is permanent. Two-step pipeline: ① Paste top comments → automatically analyze hidden emotions and real pain points → Extract a strong point that can serve as a headline ② One-click platform selection → Douyin live script (with timestamps and emotion annotations), WeChat in-depth article, Xiaohongshu image-text notes —— Three completely different writing logics, not copy-paste with a few word changes Essential difference from free AI: forced removal of AI flavor. What you get is not nonsense starting with 'In today's society' or 'To sum up', but real content ready to shoot and publish. Full guidance throughout, output with human touch.
SCI Rebuttal Generator
At the final stage of SCI paper publication, properly handling peer review comments is crucial. When facing a Major Revision or harsh review comments, authors often spend significant effort deciphering the reviewer's intent and crafting a response in rigorous, appropriate academic English. A single misstep in tone, logic, or format in the rebuttal letter can trigger negative emotions from reviewers, leading to eventual rejection and severely delaying research dissemination. This skill is specifically designed for graduate students, university faculty, and researchers, built on established best practices from top international journals and academic publishing standards. Simply input the reviewer's original comment and briefly describe your actual response in Chinese (no matter how straightforward), and the engine will automatically restructure the logic to generate: ✅ Academic Tone Restructuring: Convert plain Chinese ideas into objective, humble, and professional top-tier academic English, avoiding misunderstandings due to language habits. ✅ Standardized Point-by-Point Response: Strictly follow the point-by-point response paradigm favored by top international journals, with clear structure for rapid verification by editors and reviewers. ✅ Multi-Scenario Strategy Matching: Includes 5 professional response strategies (accept suggestion and revise, agree but need extensive revision, acknowledge limitations, define research scope, politely refute), providing airtight defensive phrasing. ✅ Taboo Expression Filter: Automatically identify and correct implied offensive expressions in rebuttals (like 'obviously', 'the reviewer is wrong'), ensuring tone remains appropriate. [Use Case Demo] 📝 Your Input: Reviewer's Comment: The experimental method is somewhat outdated. Why not use the latest Method X? Your Chinese Idea: Method X is indeed new, but it doesn't suit the specific materials of this study, and current experimental conditions cannot realize it. I have already added an explanation in the discussion section for why the current method was chosen. ✨ AI-Generated Top-Tier Response: Reviewer's Comment: The experimental method is somewhat outdated. Why not use the latest Method X? Author's Response: We are grateful for this insightful suggestion. While we recognize the value of Method X as a highly advanced approach, it falls outside the primary focus of the current study because our material system requires specific characterization conditions that Method X does not currently support. We have explicitly discussed this methodological choice and its rationale in the revised manuscript (Discussion Section, Page 8, Lines 234-241) to clarify this point. Action Taken: Added a new paragraph in the Discussion section (Page 8) explaining the rationale for the chosen method. [Academic Integrity Commitment] This skill strictly adheres to academic ethics: it does not fabricate references, invent experimental data, or make academic judgments for you. All response strategies are reconstructed based on the real information you provide; AI is only responsible for language restructuring and logical optimization. When your input is insufficient to generate a complete response, AI will clearly indicate what needs to be supplemented, never making up scientific reasons on its own. [Scope of Application] SCI / SSCI / EI journal revision submissions, conference paper rebuttals, peer review communications. Eliminate cross-language communication barriers, reduce energy loss during revision. Hand over the tedious response work to AI, allowing you to focus on research itself. Help your academic work achieve acceptance!
Find your next favorite skill
Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.