Public Opinion Risk Monitor
Track sentiment, assess risk, compare rivals
Public Opinion Risk Monitor
Track sentiment, assess risk, compare rivals
Showcase
Description
Turn vague monitoring needs involving a company, brand, person, product, event, or industry issue into a clear, actionable public opinion analysis plan. It defines the subjects, monitoring mode, time range, region, and output format; expands core terms, aliases, related entities, and industry risk terms; and lists the planned coverage across news media, social platforms, video platforms, forums and communities, review and complaint sites, official announcements, and regulatory and judicial sources. You confirm the scope before collection begins; if direct execution is authorized, the complete plan and its criteria are still retained. Based on public information, it creates a source-backed materials list with timestamps, platforms, and coverage notes. It distinguishes reposts, promotional content, and verifiable facts, avoiding claims that results from a single platform represent the entire internet. Analysis includes volume trends, sentiment, topic clusters, peak drivers, propagation paths, key communicators, and risk levels, while clearly separating facts, inferences, and recommendations. For competitor monitoring, it supports multidimensional comparisons of product features, service capabilities, advertising, marketing campaigns, user sentiment, and profitability, explaining the basis for each rating and the sources of differences. The results can be organized into a decision-maker-friendly public opinion report with an executive summary, trends and visual maps, risk alerts, response messaging, data sources, and uncovered channels. It can also generate a visual webpage, an executive presentation version, or a recurring monitoring plan as needed.
Related Skills
View all
Competitive Intel Analyst
Start with a broad view to build a persuasive competitor database, then focus the output on the company’s core business and decision-making needs. This elevates competitor research from “case hunting” to a decision basis that can be verified, compared, and acted on. This is not a prompt that merely lists a few competitors and stitches together webpage screenshots, nor one that crams every database detail into a PPT. “Competitive Intel Analyst” is suitable for consumer goods, technology products, software services, healthcare, education, retail, manufacturing, and other industries. It first defines the research scope and builds a multidimensional search framework covering markets, companies, products/services, user value, technology paths, business models, pricing and channels, intellectual property, partners, and evidence sources. It then creates a continuously updateable, deduplicated, traceable competitor database. Finally, based on the company’s core business, intended use cases, and leadership’s decision questions, it selects a small number of highly relevant benchmarks and produces a conclusion-first leadership briefing PPT, opportunity gaps, and an action roadmap. Suitable for: Panoramic scans of new markets or product categories Product planning, technology planning, and annual strategy research Tracking key competitors, patents, suppliers, or partner ecosystems Adding to, cleaning, and updating evidence in existing competitor databases or PPTs Investment, business development, and management decision briefings Condensing large volumes of material into conclusions that leaders can understand and teams can act on Typical deliverables include a complete competitor database, a shortlist of core competitors, a leadership briefing PPT, technology/patent/ecosystem maps (as needed), an opportunity and risk list, 90/180/365-day action roadmaps, and a source index.
ResearchCompetitor Content Strategy
Turn content from competitor or benchmark accounts into an evidence-based, appropriately scoped content strategy report that you can put into action. Whether you provide local materials, article links, pasted text, or only an account name, the analysis can first build a source inventory, check sample coverage, time span, column and format distribution, and flag failed retrievals, missing information, or insufficient samples to avoid drawing overly certain conclusions from limited evidence. From there, it breaks down the benchmark account's topic angles, headline construction, opening promise, body pacing, and closing actions. It extracts reusable topic patterns, headline formulas, and structural frameworks while distinguishing consistently recurring tactics from isolated examples. The analysis goes beyond general judgments such as “worth learning from.” It considers your account positioning, platform format, stage, production capacity, category, and compliance boundaries to determine what can be adopted directly, what needs to be adapted, and what risks may come from copying it. It also provides practical adaptation directions and an action checklist for this week. If you provide content from your own account, the analysis can further compare it with your existing style, capability gaps, and audience expectations, then arrange a more suitable order for transferring applicable approaches. In the end, you can receive a conversation overview and a complete content strategy report. When needed, it can also generate a single-file HTML report that is easy to save, print, and share. Suitable for content creators, social media operators, and brand teams conducting competitor content analysis, planning topics, and building an account system.
WriteSocial Content Precheck
Before publishing on WeChat Channels, WeChat Official Accounts, Douyin, Xiaohongshu, Kuaishou, Bilibili, Zhihu, Weibo, or other platforms, get a precheck covering compliance risks, audience response, and reach potential. Whether it is a short-video script, image-and-text post, WeChat Official Account article, Moments copy, livestream script, or direct-message script, the precheck starts with the original text, identifies the platform, category, target audience, and publishing goal, then flags risks such as performance promises, absolute claims, restricted areas in regulated industries, and inducements to move users off-platform. The precheck uses traceable, up-to-date rules to flag high-, medium-, and low-risk wording line by line, explain the basis for each judgment, and provide ready-to-use replacement copy that preserves the original tone and rhythm. It also highlights differences in review standards across platforms. For the target audience, it simulates reactions in the first three seconds or at the start of reading, generates authentic-sounding comments showing support, skepticism, and backlash, and identifies the sentence most likely to attract criticism. For reach evaluation, the Skill provides explainable scores based on the hook, emotion, information gain, identity, quotability, likelihood of being read or watched to completion, and path to action. It gives platform fit, probability ranges, and the highest-priority changes. The final delivery includes an in-chat overview and a full report, helping you quickly decide whether to publish as is, publish after revisions, or rewrite—and provides a clean version of the copy for retesting.
Information
- Version
- v2
- Last updated
- Runtime credits
- Usage-based
- Models
- Auto
