First Principles Writing
First Principles Writing
Showcase
Description
Turn an idea, a sentence, a collection of scattered thoughts, or an existing article into a complete, readable, publishable piece. The backend uses first-principles reasoning, while the front end uses a two-pass writing mechanism: the first pass makes the article work (logic, structure, emotional stance, concrete material), and the second pass specifically removes AI writing habits. The de-AI rules are strictly enforced: no aphorisms, no over-structuring, no forced elevation; better plain and accurate than polished and empty. The author's original voice is preserved, and the tool does not fabricate experiences or emotions for the author.
Recommended by
Dancang
Why we love this skill
Breaks away from typical AI-polish approaches, using underlying logical reasoning to turn scattered ideas into in-depth long-form articles. While completing the argument, it tightly controls ornate phrasing and precisely preserves the author's authentic voice and expressive personality.
Related Skills
View all
ResearchAcademic Paper Writing v4.1
A full-process academic paper writing system that combines the Five Sources model with the AFP 3.1 three-layer architecture. Other AI tools help you "write" a paper; this one helps you "plug" every hole that could get it rejected—from one vague idea to a complete submission package in a single run through seven modules, with an anti-hallucination gate, archive-code resume, and four-core review. [10-second value] One sentence of an idea → a submittable, complete paper package. Real sources are enforced throughout, every citation is verifiable, and you can resume across sessions right where you left off. [Trigger phrases] write a paper / literature review / research method design / how to write the discussion / paper polishing / abstract & keywords / submission package [Seven modules, all fully executable instructions] Phase 1 Topic & Introduction → Phase 2 Literature Review → Phase 3 Research Method Design → Phase 4 Discussion → Phase 5 Conclusion → Phase 6 Abstract & Keywords → Phase 7 Full-Text Integration & Submission Package. Phase 0 entry routes A–G map one-to-one to the seven modules, with an R option to restore your last progress via an archive code or archived document. [v4.1 upgrades] 1. Evidence-chain gate (hard constraint): a material registry (M1/M2 numbering) + four citation elements (author / year / title / verifiable locator) + three-color marking (✅ user-supplied / ⚠️ to verify / 🚫 prohibited). If the material library is empty, the system outputs only an outline and search queries and refuses to generate body text with citations; generating references from memory or fabricating volume, issue, or page numbers is forbidden. 2. Archive-code protocol: each module ends with a structured archive code that can be saved as a YouMind document. In your next session, simply reference it with @ to resume without re-requesting already locked information. 3. Reproducible scoring: the C core anchors all dimensions to behavioral standards scored at 4/6/8/10 with stated rationale; the ratchet mechanism only moves scores upward, never downward. 4. Four-discipline configuration library (1A Humanities & Arts / 1B Social Sciences / 2A Science & Engineering / 2B Agriculture, Medicine & Life Sciences), with automatic switching of theory libraries, method toolboxes, and disciplinary norms; Category 2B runs ethics review checkpoints at Phases 0, 3, and 7. 5. Three-paradigm routing (quantitative / qualitative / theoretical): literature review narrative strategies and research method design follow different paths. 6. Anti-cliché checklist and prohibitions: discussion sections using phrases like "limited time and energy" or "pending further research," conclusions introducing new data or literature, and abstracts containing claims unsupported by the body text are all sent back by the B core. 7. Adaptivity: user profile (beginner / intermediate / proficient) + paper type (journal / thesis / conference / course) + pacing mode (default / fast-forward / slow-motion) + multi-task isolation. 8. Submission package & compliance: seven consistency checks, a six-link logic chain, reference formatting (GB/T 7714 / APA 7 / Vancouver / IEEE), ethics approval number, data availability statement, generative AI use disclosure draft, and cover letter draft. [How to use] Tell the system: your discipline, target journal / paper type / word count, and which stage you're at. The system advances module by module, pausing after each one to deliver the section, review report, scorecard, and archive code, then waits for your confirmation before continuing. [Responsibility boundaries] The system handles sources 1–4 (structure, material organization, style, integration); source 5, human calibration, is yours: academic judgment, fact-checking, and innovation decisions. All ⚠️-marked citations and data must be verified by you item by item before submission; this skill does not promise any acceptance or pass outcome.
WriteFull-Process Academic Writing
"Full-Process Academic Writing" is an intelligent assistant tool designed for researchers, aimed at covering every stage of academic paper writing from initial conception to final submission. Whether you have just a vague research direction or have a draft that needs polishing, this tool provides systematic support to help you efficiently produce high-quality academic work. This tool guides you through four key stages. First is **Topic Planning**, which helps you refine preliminary ideas into concrete, feasible research topics and questions, and generates a comprehensive Topic Evaluation Report covering research framework, method matching, timeline planning, and resource bottleneck identification. Next is the **Literature Review** stage, assisting you in building search strategies, organizing core literature, and writing a logically rigorous literature review draft that identifies research gaps. The third stage is **Structured Writing**, where the tool designs a detailed paper outline based on your topic and literature review, and drafts the introduction, methods, body, and conclusions chapter by chapter, while also providing scientific chart code to ensure a complete structure and rigorous argumentation. Finally, the **Polishing and Revision** stage performs a comprehensive academic standard check, six-dimensional language polishing, and logical coherence review, and embeds an AI-assisted writing statement to ensure your final draft meets publishable professional standards. Throughout the writing process, this tool always adheres to academic ethics standards. All citations will be clearly flagged for verification and will never be fabricated. Output from each stage proceeds only after your confirmation, ensuring every step aligns with your research intent, allowing you to focus on expressing your ideas while leaving tedious formatting and standards to AI.
WriteCritical Writing · IBAC
Many articles lack depth not because of the writing, but because the author has not fully clarified what question they are answering or why their conclusion follows. This skill uses Tian Hongyun’s critical writing structure, IBAC— I: Issue, B: major premise (hidden assumptions and beliefs), A: minor premise (facts and evidence), and C: Conclusion—to first narrow a topic into an arguable question, then create an IBAC argument map and pause for your confirmation. Once confirmed, it turns the framework into a complete argumentative essay, along with a hand-drawn marker-style structure diagram and an IBAC self-checklist that identifies, point by point, where premises remain weak and where evidence is missing. It does not embellish or fabricate: wherever evidence is insufficient, it writes “evidence needed” rather than glossing over the gap with rhetoric. Suitable for academic writing, science communication, workplace writing, and independent media, with flexible use across contexts.
Information
- Version
- v3
- Last updated
- Runtime credits
- Usage-based
- Models
- Auto
