National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) Application Writing Coach (Trial Version)
Transform vague ideas into a solid draft of a National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) grant proposal. Follow the six main steps to avoid overstepping boundaries, fabricating information, and creating a disconnect between theory and practice. Clearly state your direction in one sentence and you can start writing.
Why we love this skill
This skill is a powerful tool for applying for National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) grants. It uses a rigorous six-step main chain method to steadily transform vague ideas into high-quality first drafts of applications, ensuring that the logic is sound and the application stays on topic.
Instructions
The author has set the instructions to private. Below is a brief overview.
Description
Based on multiple national natural science foundation (NSFC) application guidance monographs, the analysis of numerous successful grant proposals, and real-world writing experience from five NSFC general program projects, this lightweight, step-by-step coaching approach is designed to help you quickly gather information on your application category, research direction, and initial ideas using a selectable online questionnaire. It then follows a six-step main chain: "Topic Definition → Basis for Project Establishment → Research Objectives and Key Scientific Questions → Research Content → Innovative Research Approach → Basic Compliance Abstract Conclusion." This approach ensures no overstepping of boundaries, no fabrication of literature data, no unsubstantiated exaggerations of innovation, and a seamless, interconnected process to prevent inconsistencies. Suitable for first-time applicants who want to quickly navigate the NSFC application process—it offers a low barrier to entry, allowing you to confidently produce a first draft ready for submission.
Related Skills
View all
WriteZeng Guofan's review skills
Morning Reflection—A daily structured reflection dialogue. It reads yesterday's report, runs a 4-question structured interview, extracts today's top 3 priorities, and saves output to Obsidian. Trigger methods: /morning-review, /morning-reflection, /review, "morning-reflection", "morning review", "good morning", "let's reflect", "start reflecting", "today's reflection", "review yesterday", "reflect on yesterday", "yesterday's reflection", "review". Quick mode supported: /morning-review quick, /morning-reflection quick.
WriteAcademic Paper AIGC Rewriting Expert v6.0 (Plagiarism Reduction and Quality Preservation)
Based on a three-tiered, progressive closed-loop system of "source control → process correction → result verification," this approach integrates the holistic writing perspective of the "Big Cycle Iron Triangle," the five-source model for source control, 10 AI text fingerprint diagnostic methods, three-dimensional seven-subtype detailed diagnostics, 13 sentence transformation techniques, and 20 AI-generated catchphrase elimination strategies. While strictly adhering to academic norms and protecting the original meaning, it systematically reduces the AIGC risk characteristics of academic papers. Services include AIGC risk diagnosis of the full text or chapters of the paper before submission, report-driven rewriting, target journal adaptation, and final review before submission.
WriteReview agent prompts coach
Through interview-style dialogue, the system gradually extracts and clarifies the grading and evaluation criteria that teachers "know but can't articulate," helping them write a complete set of prompts for assignment grading that can be directly deployed to intelligent agent platforms (such as Coze, Dify, and Yuanqi). This includes quantitative scoring, heuristic qualitative feedback, a format compliance checklist, multiple iterations, and a final growth review, along with deployment guidelines. The generated evaluation criteria can also be submitted to WORKBUDDY to form an evaluation skill. Calling this skill allows WORKBUDDY to automatically grade assignments, especially those that are "poorly formatted."
National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) Application Writing Coach (Trial Version)
Transform vague ideas into a solid draft of a National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) grant proposal. Follow the six main steps to avoid overstepping boundaries, fabricating information, and creating a disconnect between theory and practice. Clearly state your direction in one sentence and you can start writing.
Why we love this skill
This skill is a powerful tool for applying for National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) grants. It uses a rigorous six-step main chain method to steadily transform vague ideas into high-quality first drafts of applications, ensuring that the logic is sound and the application stays on topic.
Instructions
The author has set the instructions to private. Below is a brief overview.
Description
Based on multiple national natural science foundation (NSFC) application guidance monographs, the analysis of numerous successful grant proposals, and real-world writing experience from five NSFC general program projects, this lightweight, step-by-step coaching approach is designed to help you quickly gather information on your application category, research direction, and initial ideas using a selectable online questionnaire. It then follows a six-step main chain: "Topic Definition → Basis for Project Establishment → Research Objectives and Key Scientific Questions → Research Content → Innovative Research Approach → Basic Compliance Abstract Conclusion." This approach ensures no overstepping of boundaries, no fabrication of literature data, no unsubstantiated exaggerations of innovation, and a seamless, interconnected process to prevent inconsistencies. Suitable for first-time applicants who want to quickly navigate the NSFC application process—it offers a low barrier to entry, allowing you to confidently produce a first draft ready for submission.
Related Skills
View allWriteZeng Guofan's review skills
Morning Reflection—A daily structured reflection dialogue. It reads yesterday's report, runs a 4-question structured interview, extracts today's top 3 priorities, and saves output to Obsidian. Trigger methods: /morning-review, /morning-reflection, /review, "morning-reflection", "morning review", "good morning", "let's reflect", "start reflecting", "today's reflection", "review yesterday", "reflect on yesterday", "yesterday's reflection", "review". Quick mode supported: /morning-review quick, /morning-reflection quick.
WriteAcademic Paper AIGC Rewriting Expert v6.0 (Plagiarism Reduction and Quality Preservation)
Based on a three-tiered, progressive closed-loop system of "source control → process correction → result verification," this approach integrates the holistic writing perspective of the "Big Cycle Iron Triangle," the five-source model for source control, 10 AI text fingerprint diagnostic methods, three-dimensional seven-subtype detailed diagnostics, 13 sentence transformation techniques, and 20 AI-generated catchphrase elimination strategies. While strictly adhering to academic norms and protecting the original meaning, it systematically reduces the AIGC risk characteristics of academic papers. Services include AIGC risk diagnosis of the full text or chapters of the paper before submission, report-driven rewriting, target journal adaptation, and final review before submission.
WriteReview agent prompts coach
Through interview-style dialogue, the system gradually extracts and clarifies the grading and evaluation criteria that teachers "know but can't articulate," helping them write a complete set of prompts for assignment grading that can be directly deployed to intelligent agent platforms (such as Coze, Dify, and Yuanqi). This includes quantitative scoring, heuristic qualitative feedback, a format compliance checklist, multiple iterations, and a final growth review, along with deployment guidelines. The generated evaluation criteria can also be submitted to WORKBUDDY to form an evaluation skill. Calling this skill allows WORKBUDDY to automatically grade assignments, especially those that are "poorly formatted."
Find your next favorite skill
Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.