STROBE/CONSORT Section Writer
Writes to the right reporting standard
STROBE/CONSORT Section Writer
Writes to the right reporting standard
Showcase
Description
Produces complete Methods + Results sections according to the reporting standard appropriate for your study design (STROBE for observational studies and CONSORT for randomized controlled trials). It then transparently audits which checklist items are missing or weakly reported and provides suggestions for completing them. Suitable for researchers seeking robust reporting before journal submission and graduate students writing a thesis.
Recommended by
Shuting@YouMind
Why we love this skill
Matches study designs to STROBE or CONSORT and creates publication-ready Methods and Results sections. It also reports effect sizes with confidence intervals, checks causal language, and clearly flags missing checklist items.
Best for
For health sciences researchers who want to strengthen reporting completeness before journal submission or thesis writing.
How to use this Skill
Provide your input
Provide your study design, sample information, outcome measures, statistical methods, main findings, and participant flow.
Run the Skill
Methods and Results sections are prepared according to the STROBE or CONSORT standard appropriate for your study type, and reporting gaps are audited.
Review your result
Receive sections adaptable for a publication or thesis, results tables, and completion suggestions for missing or weakly reported items.
Related Skills
View all
ResearchSTROBE Checklist Method Writer
Based on your cross-sectional, cohort, or case-control study design, this Skill generates a complete Methods and Results draft when you provide your participant selection method, variables, sample size rationale, and statistical methods, with implicit reference to the 22 items of the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) checklist. It also provides a mapping table showing which paragraph addresses each STROBE item—helping you respond to a journal's request to "complete the STROBE checklist" during submission. It avoids causal language, using "is associated with" rather than "causes" for observational studies, and explicitly discusses sources of bias and confounding. It is suitable for academics working in epidemiology, public health, and clinical research.
ResearchCONSORT 2010 Full Report Writer
Generates a complete Abstract + Methods + Results draft from your randomized controlled trial (RCT) data—randomization method, blinding status, power analysis, CONSORT flow counts (screened/randomized/allocated/analyzed), and ITT/PP analysis approach—in accordance with CONSORT 2010’s 25-item checklist. It never confuses ITT and PP; it checks the consistency of flow diagram counts (randomized ≥ allocated ≥ followed-up ≥ analyzed). It also proactively identifies at least 4 objections frequently raised by journal reviewers (such as “Why was an ITT analysis not reported?”, “Was the success of blinding tested?”, and “Was there any outcome switching?”) and suggests a defense sentence for each. Designed for clinical researchers and academics conducting RCTs in medicine, nursing, or pharmacy who want methodological rigor before journal submission.
ResearchQualitative Rigor & COREQ
Based on your qualitative study design, it writes a Methods section according to the Lincoln & Guba trustworthiness criteria, then transparently identifies which items are missing or weakly reported according to the COREQ checklist. Who it’s for: researchers seeking robust reporting before journal submission and graduate students writing theses.
Information
- Version
- v2
- Last updated
- Runtime credits
- Usage-based
- Models
- Auto
- Use cases
- Writing & contentResearch & analysisLearning & education
- What you get
- ReportDocumentData
