Guru Checklist: Buffett's View
Evidence-check company vs gurus,get scorecard
Description
Buffett's shareholder letters, Poor Charlie's Almanack, The Intelligent Investor—the standards of investment masters are public, but no one has ever helped you check them item by item. Enter a company (A-share/H-share/US stock), select a master's perspective: Buffett (default), Munger, Peter Lynch, Fisher, Graham. It will check online for public evidence corresponding to each standard, giving item-by-item judgments: ✅ Meets / ⚠️ Partially meets / ❌ Does not meet / ❓ Insufficient information, and generate a shareable scorecard long image (3:5 vertical, suitable for Xiaohongshu/WeChat Moments). Each delivery: ① Detailed check text: each standard with judgment, evidence, source and timestamp, plus "translation into plain English"—what this standard is really asking ② Scorecard summary (N/8 items met) + three most noteworthy points ③ A scorecard long image in classic value investing colors, ready to post Three golden rules: · Judgment must be backed by evidence; mark ❓ if not found, never fabricate data · Checklist items are faithful to the masters' published works, no fabricated "master standards" · Only present comparison results, do not represent the master's views, and do not constitute investment advice Repeat play: For the same company, check with all five masters, five perspectives cross-validate each other. Suitable for value investing learners, financial content creators, and ordinary investors who want to systematically understand a company.
Guru Checklist: Buffett's View
Evidence-check company vs gurus,get scorecard
Description
Buffett's shareholder letters, Poor Charlie's Almanack, The Intelligent Investor—the standards of investment masters are public, but no one has ever helped you check them item by item. Enter a company (A-share/H-share/US stock), select a master's perspective: Buffett (default), Munger, Peter Lynch, Fisher, Graham. It will check online for public evidence corresponding to each standard, giving item-by-item judgments: ✅ Meets / ⚠️ Partially meets / ❌ Does not meet / ❓ Insufficient information, and generate a shareable scorecard long image (3:5 vertical, suitable for Xiaohongshu/WeChat Moments). Each delivery: ① Detailed check text: each standard with judgment, evidence, source and timestamp, plus "translation into plain English"—what this standard is really asking ② Scorecard summary (N/8 items met) + three most noteworthy points ③ A scorecard long image in classic value investing colors, ready to post Three golden rules: · Judgment must be backed by evidence; mark ❓ if not found, never fabricate data · Checklist items are faithful to the masters' published works, no fabricated "master standards" · Only present comparison results, do not represent the master's views, and do not constitute investment advice Repeat play: For the same company, check with all five masters, five perspectives cross-validate each other. Suitable for value investing learners, financial content creators, and ordinary investors who want to systematically understand a company.
Find your next favorite skill
Explore more curated AI skills for research, creation, and everyday work.